You are here

Report addresses growing issues of hydrogen embrittlement in offshore environments.

29th October 2020

William Hackett has released an industry report to help minimise the risk of Hydrogen Embrittlement (HE) and Stress Induced Corrosion Cracking (SICC)

 The report includes guidance on material choices used in topside and subsea lifts, and is seen as a major step forward in increasing awareness for offshore operators of the risks associated with HE and SICC.

“There is a real concern across industry regarding the impact of HE and SICC on chains and links used in lift and hoist projects across offshore environments,” Ben Burgess, director of William Hackett Lifting Products, said.

Peer-reviewed by a number of organisations and authorities, the report takes a major step forward to explain the critical impact of HE.

 Dr Emilio Martínez-Pañeda, Assistant Professor at Imperial College London and a world-recognised expert in hydrogen embrittlement, welcomed the report. While not directly involved in the report’s findings, Dr Martínez-Pañeda emphasised the challenging nature of hydrogen embrittlement and its important implications: "Hydrogen is famed for causing notorious structural integrity problems that are difficult to predict, and there is a need for new guidelines and solutions."

“Based on our own experiences of how our products perform offshore, combined with the manufacturing expertise of McKinnon Chain and outcomes of detailed technical analysis by industry partners, we have identified that as material hardness exceeds 39-40 HRC, the risk of HE and SICC increases as the hardness values rise,” Burgess said.

But the issue of HE is not limited to just one type of activity. Examples include the failure of G10 welded chain slings in a container fleet in Norway, to the USA where a global oil company had to withdraw a number of lifting appliances and promptly introduced an inspection regime before any future lift work was carried out.

The report also highlights that whilst products may be fully compliant with relevant International Standards, the reality is that when it comes to an offshore environment, they may be wholly unsuitable.

“Meeting the specific International Standards should not be seen as a guarantee that specific equipment is fit for purpose in an offshore environment,” Burgess added. “Specific environmental and performance considerations for equipment used offshore needs to be a key part of the material specification and selection process.

“To put this into context a Grade 8 master link, when correctly heat treated, will provide toughness, tensile strength and resistance to shock absorption in loading, and at hardness levels that enable the steel in the product to withstand extreme conditions of the offshore environment.”

Correct materials selection is critical, especially when it comes to problems such as HE. Operators need to ensure that despite commercial pressures, the products used in the offshore environment are fully appropriate for their intended use, and that the environmental conditions, mechanical stresses and material susceptibility have all been assessed rigorously.

Dr Martínez-Pañeda noted that while the scientific community has achieved great progress in using simulation tools to predict the behaviour of components exposed to hydrogen, challenges remain and “the materials to be used and the manufacturing process has to be tested and assessed to minimise the risks as much as possible.”

Burgess believes that managing the risks of HE and SICC requires a change of mindset. “The advancement towards higher and higher grades of steel should be treated with caution,” he concluded. “In an offshore environment, procurement and quality assurance policies should include comprehensive details of the material’s properties, as well as standard compliance. Without the proper understanding of the material and its use offshore, the end result is increased risk to operations.”

 

Related topics: